Sunday, August 30, 2009
Howard Schultz, CEO of Starbucks, is coming to Ann Arbor on Wednesday, September 2nd 2009.
Protest: 12 Noon to 1:30 PM,
Day: Wednesday, September 2nd 2009.
Place: Cobblestone Farm, 2781 Packard Road, Ann Arbor, MI.
Cobblestone's Tel: 734.794.6230
Gaza is dying:
* In Gaza, anemia among children 9-12 months old stood at over 60 percent in February of 2009 (U.N. Office for Humanitarian Affairs)
* Bloody diarrhea and viral hepatitis remain major causes of morbidity among the refugee population of the Gaza Strip.
Starbucks CEO: Hip-Deep in the Blood of Palestine.
See the article, below, from the last time he was picketed in Ann Arbor:
"Ann Arbor Jews protest Israel fundraiser"
ARAB AMERICAN NEWS
December 4-10, 2004
By Danielle Smith -- ANN ARBOR - Protesters stood outside theYpsilanti Marriott here this week on Palestine Solidarity Day in an effort to confront the guests of the Jewish Federation of Washtenaw County's fourth annual fundraising event. Palestine Solidarity Day observes the anniversary of the UN Partition Plan of 1947 which created the State of Israel on Palestinian land.
The protest was a silent vigil organized by Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends (JWP & F) and took place on November 27th. Blaine Coleman, one protester, said, "Raising money for Israel, when the Israeli state is so thuggishly robbing and killing Palestine, is wrong."
The event was sponsored in part by Ford Motor Company.
Howard Schultz, Chairman and CEO of Starbucks Coffee, was the featured speaker. Schultz has long been a lightning rod of controversy due his support of Israel. In 1998 he was honored by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with "The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award" for his services to the Jewish state in "playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel". The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah funds the largely discredited website honestreporting.com and has been accused of illegally funding Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud party.
The Jewish Federation claims that it initiates, coordinates, and supports activities here at home and around the world that strengthen Jewish life. JWP & F's founder Henry Herskovitz claims most of the more than half a million dollars raised at the dinner each year goes directly to Israel.
Neal Elyakin of Ann Arbor is the new federation president and is also a founder of the "Michigan Friends of the Israel Defense Forces," an organization that has outraged many Arab Americans in the Michigan community and which has recently been involved in an advertising scandal with local banks.
Herskovitz actually purchased a hotel room at the Marriott so the security guards could not kick him out went he went inside.
Henry said, "After the protest I went into the hotel lobby bar with my Free PalestineT-Shirt to watch attendees leaving the conference. I saw (U. S. Rep.) John Dingell, Ann Arbor Police Chief Dan Oates, Joan Lowenstein, Leigh Greden, four Ann Arbor city Councilpersons and four rabbis of Ann Arbor - Rob Dobrusin of Beth Israel, Bob Levy of Temple Beth Emeth, Aharon Goldstein of Chabad House, and his son Rabbi Alter Goldstein, of an unknown congregation.
"The security told me I was smart to buy a room 'or you would be so out of here...' "
"Starbucks the target of Arab boycott for its growing links to Israel"
by Robert Fisk
"The Independent" (UK), June 14, 2002, at:
"Across five Arab states a new and closely co-ordinated campaign to boycott American goods is being launched, with Starbucks coffee shops their primary target, but with Nestlé, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson and Burger King outlets also on the list. In Beirut today, activists will be leafleting outside the city's four Starbucks shops, detailing the pro-Israeli sentiments of its chief executive, Howard Shultz, and claiming he is 'an active Zionist'.
"In 1998, Mr Shultz was awarded the "Israeli 50th Anniversary Tribute Award" from the Jerusalem Fund of Aish Ha-Torah, which is strongly critical of Yasser Arafat and insists that the occupied Palestinian territories should be described only as 'disputed'.
"In a speech to Jewish Americans in Seattle earlier this year – at the height of the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon's, reoccupation of West Bank towns – Starbucks' top man condemned Palestinian 'inaction' and announced that 'the Palestinians aren't doing their job – they're not stopping terrorism'. Gideon Meir, an Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman, complimented Mr Shultz for helping American students to hear 'Israeli presentations on the Middle East crisis'.
"...Mr Shultz is a regular visitor to Israel and one of many personalities who have been brought to Jerusalem as a guest of the Theodor Herzl mission, at whose gala dinner is held an award ceremony of the Friends of Zion to honour those 'who have played key roles in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel'."
More boycott news...
"Oxford City Council calls for boycott" against Israel-
"Oxford City Council calls for boycott"
See video at:
"Oxford City council called for a boycott of Israeli products following Israel’s assault on Gaza.
"In an unprecedented move, the Council passed a motion, which as well as condemning the loss of civilian life in Gaza, called for individuals to boycott products made by Israel."
You can view the full motion, recognizing the importance of boycotting Israel, on the Oxford City Council's Web site.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Boycotting "Israel" to Death -- at Ann Arbor City Council.
This video was taken August 17, 2009, at the City Council meeting.
To see the video, click on YouTube at:
Thousands have petitioned Ann Arbor City Council for sanctions against "Israel", the Racist Butcher State.
Instead of paying "Israel" $300 billion to massacre Palestine, Congress should spend that $300 billion re-building Detroit... NOW!
Since 1984, people have demanded sanctions against "Israel" at Ann Arbor City Council--
See the January 10, 1984 "Ann Arbor News", at:
Note: Congressman John Dingell has admitted that Congress has given $300 billion to "Israel":
Friday, August 14, 2009
1. "The alliance between Israel and South Africa is more intimate and more extensive than anything similar in Israel’s history...."
—from Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi’s book “The Israeli Connection: Who Israel Arms and Why” (1987)
2. "...in 1975, U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger asked Israel to help with the failing South African invasion of Angola. Israel responded by sending military advisers and electronic equipment to the front.” [referencing the 'Economist', article entitled 'The Israeli Connection', November 5, 1977].
—from Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi’s book “The Israeli Connection: Who Israel Arms and Why” (1987)
Two articles on Israel's intimate alliance with white-supremacist South Africa:
From Sherry Wolf's article, "Israel, the 'lobby,' and the United States"
April 20, 2007
Any casual observer of Israeli armed might must marvel at the extraordinary fact that a country comprising a mere .001 percent of the world’s population has “the fifth most powerful war machine in the world.” 19
This obscene arsenal is not just used for territorial control and “security,” Israel acts as a bully-for-hire to many of the dictatorships, death squads, and undemocratic allies of the United States.
When Iran’s democratically elected leader Mohammed Mossadeq nationalized the oil fields there in 1951, the daily Ha’aretz laid out the role Israel could play for its Western backers:
"Israel is to become the watchdog. There is no fear that Israel will undertake any aggressive policy towards the Arab states when this would explicitly contradict the wishes of the U.S. and Britain. But if for any reasons the Western powers should sometimes prefer to close their eyes, Israel could be relied upon to punish one or several neighboring states whose discourtesy to the West went beyond the bounds of the permissible." 20
There is a well-documented history of Israel’s relations with apartheid South Africa, and its ongoing role of helping to prop up almost every pro-U.S. repressive regime in the world.
Israel defied the global arms embargo on the white-minority South African government to supply it with nuclear technology and helped train its notoriously brutal police and armed forces— imparting its expertise after 1967 of “suppressing a captive population and keeping hostile neighbors off balance.” 21
As one Israeli newspaper put it, “It is a clear and open secret known to everybody that in [South African] army camps one can find Israeli officers in not insignificant numbers who are busy teaching white soldiers to fight Black terrorists with methods imported from Israel.” 22
The U.S. is able to funnel weapons and aid to its unsavory allies abroad through Israel. When the exposure of human rights abuses in countries like Guatemala made it politically untenable domestically for the U.S. to continue to back this murderous regime, it outsourced the job to Israel. From the 1970s to the 1990s, a civil war pitted a populist but, in this case, mainly Indian left against a mainly European oligarchy protected by a brutal Mestizo Army. As Guatemalan President Carlos Arana said in 1971, “If it is necessary to turn the country into a cemetery in order to pacify it, I will not hesitate to do so.”
The Israelis supplied Guatemala with Galil rifles, and built an ammunition factory for them, as well as supplying armored personnel carriers and Arava planes. Behind the scenes, they were actively involved in the bloodiest counter-insurgency campaign the hemisphere has known since the European conquest, in which at least 200,000 (mostly Indians) were killed. 23
In the past Israel has supplied arms and training to: the Suharto dictatorship in Indonesia for its genocide of 200,000 East Timorese; the Nicaraguan contras for its killing of at least 50,000 oppositionists; Chile’s Pinochet dictatorship; the military dictatorships of Brazil, Argentina, El Salvador, and the list goes on. 24
But Israel’s role as America’s bully-for-hire is not just a thing of the Cold War past—though the statute of limitations on prosecuting these crimes against humanity should never run out. “I learned an infinite amount of things in Israel, and to that country I owe part of my essence, my human and military achievements,” wrote the former (and now deceased) head of the largest right-wing paramilitary group in Colombia, Carlos Castaño. As recently as 2002, the Guatemala-based Israeli company GIRSA supplied Colombian death squads with 3,000 Kalashnikov rifles and 2.5 million rounds of ammunition. 25
The American Empire will always have a need for these types of covert black ops services from a reliable ally. Israel continues to play this role efficiently and discreetly.
Finally, last summer’s invasion of Lebanon by Israel was effectively a proxy war against Syria and Iran’s Lebanese ally, Hezbollah, on behalf of the Americans who were—and continue to be—bogged down in a losing war in Iraq. The goals were to stop Hezbollah, control Lebanon, and contain Syria. Israel’s short war destroyed much of Lebanon’s infrastructure, killed more than 1,000 civilians, and created an internal refugee crisis, in addition to leaving behind thousands of unexploded cluster bombs—“killing fields in a canister” as the London Times aptly put it. 26
Though Israel was unable to politically and militarily defeat Hezbollah, the aim of the war was to help their imperial patron. That’s why leading Democrats like Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) rushed to outdo Republicans in showing support for Israel in that war. As the Washington Post argued, “For the United States, the broader goal is to strangle the axis of Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria and Iran, which the Bush administration believes is pooling resources to change the strategic playing field in the Middle East, U.S. officials say.” 27
Right-wing columnist Charles Krauthammer summed up the invasion as, “Israel’s rare opportunity to demonstrate what it can do for its great American patron.” 28
19 Frida Berrigan and William D. Hartung, “Who’s arming Israel?” Foreign Policy in Focus, July 26, 2006, http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/3387.
20 John Rose, Israel: The Hijack State, July 1986, Socialist Workers Party (UK).
21 Jane Hunter, “Israel and South Africa,” excerpted from Israeli Foreign Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press,1987), http://www.
22 Quoted in Selfa, 34.
23 Jeremy Bigwood, “Israel’s Latin American trail of terror,” June 5, 2003, http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/Israel_LAmer_TrailTerror.html.
24 Selfa, 34.
26 Simon Jenkins, “Cluster bombs: these are landmines by any other name,” London Times, October 26, 2001.
27 Robin Wright, “Strikes are called part of a bold strategy,” Washington Post, July 16, 2006.
28 Charles Krauthammer, “Israel’s Lost Moment,” Washington Post, August 4, 2006.
--Excerpted from the book, "Israeli Foreign Policy", by Jane Hunter (South End Press, 1987)
On the Web at:
--Excerpted from the book, "Israeli Foreign Policy", by Jane Hunter (South End Press, 1987)
On the Web at:
lsrael's ties with South Africa seem to be especially disturbing to many who follow Israel's international activities.
Perhaps it is natural that Israel has been castigated more harshly for its arms sales to South Africa than for its sales to other countries: first, because there has been for a decade an arms embargo against South Africa; and second, because of the unsurpassed criminality of the white regime and the uses to which it puts the Israeli-supplied weapons.
It has also been said that those arms sales are understandable, given the striking similarities between the two countries in their day-to-day abuse and repression of their subject populations, South African blacks and Palestinians under Israeli rule; in their operating philosophies of apartheid and Zionism; and in their similar objective situations: "the only two Western nations to have established themselves in a predominantly nonwhite part of the world," as a South African Broadcasting Corporation editorial put it. That understanding, however, is somewhat superficial, and the focus on similarities of political behavior has somewhat obscured the view of the breadth and depth of the totality of Israeli-South African relations and their implications.
Israel's relations with South Africa are different than its interactions with any of its other arms clients.
That Israel gave South Africa its nuclear weapons capability underscores the special nature of Tel Aviv's relations with the white minority government and begins to describe it - a full-fledged, if covert, partnership based on the determination of both countries to continue as unrepentant pariahs and to help each other avoid the consequences of their behavior.
There are few areas where the respective needs and advantages of Israel and South Africa dovetailed so perfectly as in the field of nuclear cooperation.
"The most powerful reason for Israeli willingness to bear the undesirable consequences of expanded and more open trade with South Africa may be her desire to acquire material necessary to manufacture nuclear weapons," wrote a military analyst in 1980.' To that must be added Israel's great desire to test the nuclear weapons it already had, and the attractions of South Africa's vast territory and proximity to even vaster uninhabited spaces-the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
Then at the point in its nuclear development where it was fashioning sophisticated bombs (devices which use less nuclear material but have infinitely greater explosive force than the "primitive" bomb dropped by the U.S. on Hiroshima), Israel would find it particularly helpful to observe the performance, explosive force and fallout of a detonated weapon.
Since 1984, Israel had been operating a plutonium extraction plant in a secret underground bunker at Dimona in the Negev Desert. Built by the French in the late 1950s, the Dimona plant also included facilities for manufacturing atomic bomb components. At the time of the 1976 accords, Israel was preparing to build an adjoining plant for the extraction of lithium 6, tritium and deuterium, materials required for sophisticated thermonuclear weapons.
Israel's reasons for devoting what had to have been a significant portion of its scant resources to such an ambitious nuclear weapons program - nuclear experts have recently ranked it as the world's sixth nuclear power, after the U.S., the USSR, Britain, France and China - have been variously offered as the desire to develop a credible deterrent to attack by its neighbors and the desire to substitute that deterrent for at least part of the costly conventional arsenal that Israel, with one of the world's most powerful military forces, maintains, and also (with much less frequency) as an "umbrella" over a partial withdrawal from the occupied territories.
The South Africans began teaching the lessons of Israel's 1967 war at their maneuver school, and Israeli advisers began teaching the Boers the arts of suppressing a captive population and keeping hostile neighbors off balance...
The white government's practice of domestic counterinsurgency l combines outright military brutality with the extensive use of informers and collaborators. It is impossible to know how many refinements of these age-old techniques have been borrowed from the Israelis' occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights. The Israeli system of village leagues is obviously comparable to the hated town councils imposed on segregated townships by the apartheid government.
The collective punishment employed by the Israelis, such as the destruction of a whole family's home when one of its members is arrested as a suspect in an act of resistance, has lately been matched by the recent South African practices of sealing off townships, and assaulting entire funeral processions. What is perhaps more salient is the South African victims' perceptions of Israel's involvement in their oppression and how readily that perception is communicated...
The Frontline States
The South Africans noted that their May, 1983 aerial attack (dubbed Operation Shrapnel) on Mozambique's capital, Maputo, was analogous to Israel's attack on Beirut the previous summer. one analyst, Joseph Hanlon, believes that one of South Africa's objectives in the attack was to see how its version of events would play in the media. It was received very well indeed, according to Hanlon, with the Western press accepting South Africa's claim that its attack was in "retaliation" for an ANC attack and that ANC "bases" were hit.
Instead, the South African Air Force hit a child-care center and private houses with "special fragmentation rockets," leaving 6 dead and 40 wounded. This follows the Israeli practice in Lebanon of speaking about PLO installations while civilians are the actual targets, and attacking with particularly heinous anti-personnel weapons-cluster bombs and phosphorous bombs.
The victims of South Africa's angst are not blind to the similarity of attacks-or motives.
President Samora Machel likened the Israeli Government to the Pretoria regime. He said that because of its inability to contain the fury of the Palestinian people led by the PLO, the Zionist regime is trying to transfer the war to other regions.
So reported Mozambican radio shortly after Israeli aircraft bombed PI headquarters in Tunisia in October 1985.
The model provided by Israel, which punishes every internal act of resistance and violent act outside its jurisdiction with a bombing raid on Palestinian targets in Lebanon-almost always refugee camps cynically identified by the Israelis as "terrorist bases" or "headquarters"-has served South Africa well. In January 1986, the white government's radio delivered a commentary on "the malignant presence" of "terrorism" in neighboring states and said "there's only one answer now, and that's the Israeli answer." Israel had managed to survive "by striking at terrorists wherever they exist."
In May 1986, South Africa demonstrated that it had assumed the right to attack its neighbors at a time and on a pretext of its own choosing. The chosen time was during a visit by the Eminent Persons Group of the Commonwealth of Nations, which was attempting to establish negotiations between the apartheid regime and its opposition. The victims-Zambia, Botswana and Zimbabwe, all Commonwealth members-were chosen for their alleged harboring of "terrorists"; the real victims were South African exiles and an employee of the government of Botswana. The South Africans said they had attacked "international terrorism" and compared their raids to the Israeli attack on Tunisia and the U.S. attack on Libya in April 1986.
The attack was similar in style to Israel's 1985 attack on Tunisia. Initially, the Israelis had been threatening Jordan and perhaps because King Hussein of Jordan was at the time on an official visit to the U.S., the Israelis chose to take revenge for the killing of three Israelis (believed to be top Mossad agents) in Larnaca, Cyprus on the PLO in Tunisia.
Two weeks after its three-pronged attack on its Commonwealth neighbors, South Africa attacked the Angolan harbor of Namibia, firing their version of the Israeli Gabriel missile.
Israel has also been connected with the mercenary forces deployed by South Africa against Angola and Mozambique. In the 1970s Israel aided the FNLA (Angolan National Liberation Front) proxy forces organized and trained by the CIA to forestall the formation of a government led by the MPLA (Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola-now the ruling party of Angola).
John Stockwell, who ran the CIA operation against Angola, recollected three arms shipments Israel made in cooperation with the CIA: a plane full of 120 mm shells sent via Zaire to the FNLA and Unita; a shipment of 50 SA-7 missiles (all of which were duds); a boat-load sent to neighboring Zaire in a deal that the Israelis had worked out with President Mobutu, even though the Zairian strong man had broken ties with Israel two years earlier.
When Israel reestablished relations with Zaire (in 1982) and began to train Zairian forces in the Shaba border province, Angola had cause for concern. The leader of the FNLA had been Holden Roberto, brother-in-law of Zairian president Mobutu, Israel's new client. In 1986, it would be established that Zaire acted as a funnel for "covert" U.S. military aid for the Unita forces of Jonas Savimbi.
In 1983, the Angolan News Agency reported that Israeli military experts were training Unita forces in Namibia. Since Zaire began receiving military aid and training from Tel Aviv, Angola has been ill at ease. Its worries increased after discovering that:
Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon was personally involved in the organization, training and equipping of "commando" units of the army of Zaire, especially organized for missions along the borders of the RPA [Angola].
In 1984, the Financial Times (London) wrote of "joint Israeli-South African support for Unita forces." Other sources also report the transfer of Israeli arms and financial support to Unita.
In 1983, Angola's President Jose Eduardo dos Santos told Berkeley, California Mayor Eugene (Gus) Newport that an Israeli pilot had been shot down during a South African attack. The Angolan President showed Newport pictures of captured Israeli weapons. The following year, Luanda reported the capture of three mercenaries who said they had been trained by Israeli instructors in Zaire.
Israel has also been involved with the Mozambican "contras," the South African-backed MNR (Mozambique National Resistance or "Renamo"), which has brought great economic and social distress to Mozambique. Renamo has a particular reputation for ideological incoherence, being regarded by most other right-wing insurgencies as a gang of cutthroats.
For several years there have been stories coming from Southern Africa of captured mercenaries of Renamo who say they were trained in neighboring Malawi-one of the four nations to maintain relations with Israel after the Organization of African Unity (OAU) declared a diplomatic embargo in 1973-by Israelis. And more than one report has told of "substantial Israeli aid" to the MNR, thought to have been funded by the CIA and Saudi Arabia as well as South Africa and former Portuguese nationalists.
Malcolm X, meeting with the leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1964.
This was sixteen years after European Zionists invaded Palestine, destroying over 400 Palestinian villages.
It was an extremely violent ethnic cleansing operation.
It exiled the majority of Palestinians out of Palestine.
The following resolution was proposed to the Ann Arbor City Council, for a public hearing, a public discussion, and a vote by City Council:
Resolution to Boycott the Racist State of Israel, and to Re-build Detroit
1. The City of Ann Arbor hereby refuses to buy anything imported from the State of Israel;
2. The City of Ann Arbor hereby condemns the U.S. Congress for handing $300 billion to Israel;
3.The City of Ann Arbor hereby demands that Congress immediately spend $300 billion
to re-build Detroit;
"...during my 50 years in Congress, I have proudly supported more than $300 billion dollars in aid for the State of Israel. ..."
--Congressman John Dingell, at: